Skip to main content

Classified postings do not allow for discussion (replies are not allowed).  Direct message the member if you would like to discuss the item.
The Classified section is open to any individual (non-commercial firms) posting of items for sale. Members posting commercial advertisements must be enrolled in a Supporting Merchant program. 
Postings without relevant details (PRICE, location, condition, etc.) will be deleted.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Well, the color alone blows my skirt up!

The interior isn't my favorite color and the tuck-n-roll isn't either but...

For the price, if the motor and transaxle are decent, it's a great deal!

I highly doubt though, as the information states, that the 1915 puts out 125 horsepower. It probably puts out enough to keep you in the fast lane if you want, and make the back roads a ton-of-fun!

Maybe someone near could check it out for you, anyone here?

Back in '06 when my car was built Beck had two standard engines, both of which were 1915s.  One was supposedly 90hp and not easily raised above that.  The other was rated at 125hp and could be upgraded.  I bought the latter and find it impressively quick, but it's never been on a dyno.  I've done a few small upgrades, but don't know what the effect has been.  If say 120hp is a safe bet, perhaps as much as 10 more.

Will Hesch posted:

Bob, beehives ran through late '56 but the teardrop lights started then through the 356 years so technically, a '56 could have teardrops. Ferry changed things as he wanted, not so much by calendar year.

I'd trust the Beck plate, not the pesky dealer!

I thought it was the other way around. Beehives ran through '56 and half way through '57 when the teardrops became the standard?? So a '57 could have beehives but a '56 won't have teardrops.

That's a 90hp motor with 34mm carbs...  The dealer who commissioned this build had a series of long blocks built by JCS Volks Machine that were then sent to Pat at CB for the top end, carbs, and dyno tuning.

It was an '06 build for a dealer who had a shop in NY and FL.  My notes show it shipped to NY and was purchased by a guy in St Louis at auction Feb 07.

It has been back through the shop at least once (after the auction maybe?) for an inspection.

It was factory built as a roller, the dealer had the engine installed by a local garage.

Jim is correct on the changes.  However, we've seen a few cars that were early/mid year 57 with the odd combination of teardrops and shine down.  I know this conflicts with a lot of "restorer" information, but that seems to be par for the course with early Porsches. 

 

Carry: I take exception to the "the odd combination of teardrops and shine down" remark.  While I understand the purist history here (I once had a '56 w/ beehives and a '61 with tear drops) I never really appreciated the shine-up idea.  Also, I heard that the beehives are a little dim in the replica world (maybe that has been fixed) and I wanted as much visibility as possible. So I had my car built with tear drops and shine down.  And I think it looks very cool.  No real P-car was ever built that way, you say?? Well so what?

El Frazoo, you missed the point of my message.  I actually HAVE seen an original car with the "odd combination" of teardrops and shine down.  In fact, the original car that we used for reference when making some tooling was one of these examples.  A bare metal tear down showed that this combination appeared to be the factory cutouts with no sign of change/repair, leading us to believe that this was an original oddball.  A change-over car, possibly special ordered, who knows.  Only called an "odd combination" because it goes against what all the restorers/books say.  Having restored/refreshed a few old Porsches over the years, oddball seems par for the course, especially in the early years.

Additionally, if you look at my first 150+ cars, the vast majority of them have this very same combination of shine down and teardrops, just because it is what we liked and what we modeled after...

Thanks guys, I'm really excited to get my hands on the car. I'd like to fly to Houston and drive it home but I'm a realist. I've never even sat in it. It's probably in good running order but I really hate being stranded on the side of the road. It's 10 years old and has 13K miles on it. It's probably fine but its risky trusting a car like this to take you 1100 miles the first time you drive it.

I should probably have it shipped. I'll let everyone know what I decide to do.

Paul

Mine's 10 years old and has about 45,000 miles on it, many of which were in the 10 trips from coastal South Carolina to the gathering in Carlisle, PA.  There were also several trips to the mountains.  You're smart not driving it until you've given it the once over, but after that feel confident in taking trips.  Make sure to check the date codes on the tires, regardless of how much tread they have.  Beyond seven or eight years you should replace them.  I'm in the same boat.

Add Reply

Post Content
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×