I am building a new IM with Henry. Actually he is going to start in a few weeks. I have been thinking about going with beehives versus the regular tail lights. I am wondering though, does anyone know if this is less period correct looking than the other tail lights? I do love the look of the beehives, but I really want the car to look as period correct as possible. I am going with Heron Grey and a dark saddle interior with a Beige top on the Roadster version. I am going with this color combination because I have seen pics and feel like the Heron Grey has an old fashioned look to it...Just want to make sure I don't compromise the period correctness with beehives.....Thoughts anyone??
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Both are correct depending on the year you are trying to replicate. Beehives were used through mid-1957 and teardrops afterwards. It sounds like a very nice car that you are building.
Hoss
I had an IM Roadster with tear drop tail lights, and now have an IM Speedster with Beehive tail lights. I really prefer the Beehives, as they are more distinctive and add a little touch of whimsy to the car. If you go with Beehives, have Henry install the glass lens ones, as they will not melt over time with the heat of the bulbs. They don't have the original 'stepped' design, but I think they are the better choice.
Marty on this site has an IM Roadster with Beehives, and it looks great.'
I love the Beehive look!
VINCE POST YOUR BEEHIVES PICS
Technically the Roadster never came with those lights since it came out in '59, but most folks won't know the difference. They look good and you're paying significant coinage for it, so get what you like.
Take Lane's advice, and do the car up the way you want it.
Attachments
Attachments
Attachments
bee hives are da bomb!
Look good, but might be harder to see from behind at night though.....
True, but the teardrop lights aren't really that much bigger, when half of the lens is for the directional signals. I think if you go for the glass beehives, you can put a brighter bulb in.
As for braking, Henry installs a third brake light under the air vents, which helps a lot.
Like Bob said, this weekend the 3rd brake light in the grill got a lot of praise.
What's entailed with the conversion?
From what you provide, is it a bolt on application?
You'll need to make some new tin, make adjustments to the shroud, new linkage...
I have the shroud, fan, alternator and stand.
Dialogue me if interested.
I plan on putting it on the Samba in a couple weeks.
It's a frickin replica. Have Henry install the lights you want.
It's a fake Porsche. You can put as many period correct parts on as you want. That still won't change the fact that IT IS NOT A REAL 356 PORSCHE!
It's a frickin replica. Have Henry install the lights you want.
It's a fake Porsche. You can put as many period correct parts on as you want. That still won't change the fact that IT IS NOT A REAL 356 PORSCHE!
Thank you, Mr. Mom...
It's a frickin replica. Have Henry install the lights you want.
It's a fake Porsche. You can put as many period correct parts on as you want. That still won't change the fact that IT IS NOT A REAL 356 PORSCHE!
But how do you really feel about our fake Porsche's? Where do you draw the line? At $45k?
It's a frickin replica. Have Henry install the lights you want.
It's a fake Porsche. You can put as many period correct parts on as you want. That still won't change the fact that IT IS NOT A REAL 356 PORSCHE!
Thank you, Mr. Mom...
no no - Ron is the fun police.
mine is real. a real Porsche. a genuine 1956 356 speedster A. real real real.
the air suspension is original. so are the heated seats.
everything is real and original*
(note: my car is not real. it's as fake as Pamela Anderson boobies)
Comparing Pamella's fake boobies to our fake speedsteries (okay, I know it's a crappy rhyme) is just plain cruel.