Your right Anthony, speaking of sense, sometimes it is non sensical, but we appreciate everyone 2¢ especially if you have experience to back up your information. We live in the age of teaching concepts, but few have the Experience to back up their statements. Experience is everything. Ray
There are many good engine builders and you will get different opinions on what type or weight of oil to use. I think, money aside, if you find some that works good for your engine combination and the oil pressure is good and oil temperature is good, keep on using it.
Where was I when the discussion on engine cooling was going on ? I read all the post, but had not joined yet. I enjoy reading what others have to say and sometimes, agree with their statements. No, not set in my ways. I have the "new" flip open cell phone. See, progress. Just did not need the smart phone, had the money, but no need. My cheap cell phone can hold up xxx pictures, so I use my digital Nikon which holds only 4000 images. Oh my, new tech stuff ?
I have to ask... Based on what George is saying above is this article on Nascar dot com just a bunch of B.S. to sell Mobil 1 products?
Please read and comment. Personally I use synthetic oil.
http://www.nascar.com/en_us/ne...n-racing-nascar.html
Here is another article supporting synthetic:
George kinda reminds me of another George.
15 years of experience and I have to say this site is almost 90% funded by oil preference.
-=theron
I do not like the song " Georgee Porgee" and heard that enough when a young child. You know, actually, it was about the King George in England and a political song. This has nothing to do with speedsters.
Well, friends, my project chassis is now complete, so onward to putting the body bolted to the chassis. Somehow, I just remembered we did have a small jungle with vines hanging off large Oak trees, when I was young. Wow, good memories. I probably ran into a tree , swinging on the vine and reason my logic on oil and other topics is strange.
I am doing an updated research on what NASCAR really uses in their race cars, for OIL.
Time to talk about blinker fluid.
My head is spinning...
Final comments. I looked as hard as possible on the Internet and asked this question - " What type of oil is used most of the time in NASCAR engines?" As we wonder about that Mobil 1 commercial shown on the Internet. And, looked for answers about synthetic compared to petroleum oil and found almost no discussion. In Wikelicks ( spelling) that site does not address what race cars mostly use. They do not discuss what NASCAR really uses in their engines. In the write-up about synthetic, the web site stated that MOSTLY petroleum oil is the standard in use, due to 100 years of development and improvement. So, most people and most engines still use the old stuff and there is no discussion about use of synthetic in race engines. I liked the research on top fuel engines and their use of oil, their 150 plus PSI oil pressure and so forth. I think I read they use 70wt. oil. Well, we are not running 10,000hp engines in our speedsters, so back to reality. What is unanswered in this discussion about oil is does the synthetic carry off the heat from the engine to the oil cooler and therefore help to keep the engine run cooler. VW said 40% of the cooling of the engine is based on what the oil does. They did not test results using synthetic. Are there any auto engineers or perhaps mechanical engineers who own speedsters, whom can answer these questions ?
I love "oil wars".
Let's talk about GL4 vs GL5 gear lube!
I wasn't being serious, George. There's nothing (and I really mean nothing) like the holy wars that get started over oil. Car guys LOVE arguing about this stuff.
Check this out:
http://www.thesamba.com/vw/for...ewtopic.php?t=276529
That's 42 pages of gear-lube love. Pages and pages and pages of smart guys going to the mat for their particular gear lube. It'd be comical, if people weren't so foaming-at-the-mouth adamant about it.
FWIW, it was GL4 that was recommended by VW. GL5 is a better for hypoid gears. There is a fair amount of concern about GL5 attacking the yellow metal (brass) used in the syncro rings. I've used GL5, I think the fears are overblown and it's a suitable replacement... but as far as I know, it wasn't the VW factory recommended lube for manual transmissions.
There's a trade-off with everything. GL5 is better for the hypoid gears, GL4 is better for the syncro rings. All things being equal, I'll take my chances on GL5.
Another George used to say, "you pay your money and you take your chances".
Short parts person story. This is funny. Not being sexist on this, but it was a "girl" who waited on me. Went into the auto parts store and asked for a pressure plate. She had one for a VW Beetle and brought a
reconditioned one to me, in a box. I opened the box and the fingers were all NOT even and it looked bad to me. Here is the funny part. I told the young lady the part she was showing me was not good and she said " Sir, if it does not work, it is warrantied . " At that point, I asked to talk with the manager. Real true story .
I'm unclear why you keep saying that, George. The image I posted above is from the Bentley VW official factory service manual. I've got the latest edition of the same manual, and the recommendations haven't changed. The factory manual plainly recommended GL4, both when the vehicle was new and with the latest service manual.
I'm not trying to be contentious, just pointing out that the manufacturer "wanted the owner (and servicer) of the new car" to use GL4 in a manual transmission.
I'm running GL5 in my car (Swepco 201) because I believe it's better. I'd rather protect my (really expensive) gears than my (relatively cheap) syncro rings. I'm not smarter than the old German engineers, but time has moved on. You seem to agree- at least I think you do. You're strongly advocating for GL5, even though it isn't the factory recommended oil for old VW transaxles.
So, back to engine oil- I run Penn 10W30 in the engine (at $7.50/qt, no dancing lady) because it's got an additive pack that I believe is better for flat tappet engines than the current (low zinc, low phosphorus) SM/SL/SJ/SH formulas. Penn oil has 1500 ppm of Zn and 1340- 1400 ppm P. As you know, these are "sacrificial" elements in oil to protect cam lobes and tappet faces in high-pressure situations (like a flat-tappet engine with dual valve-springs). Modern engines don't have crazy cam/tappet loads (too much frictional loss) and these sacrificial metals foul catalytic converters, so they have been greatly reduced in modern formulas. The Zn/P additives also leave sludge deposits unless the oil formula has a good detergent pack and the oil is changed often, so if they are not needed it's better to not have them- hence the new formula.
I DO want the additives, and I'm not smart enough to play home-brew chemist by adding a zinc/phosphate additive to a modern SM/SL/SJ/SH oil. I have no idea what kind of detergent pack there is in the oil, and whether or not it will play nicely with the additive. Other guys have no compunction doing just that. Everybody has their own opinion. The factory recommended 30 weight oil- and there are still guys out there who swear it's the only way. Never mind that the 30 weight they are running isn't the same 30 weight Granddad used to put in his Beetle... but if it makes them feel happy, I suppose there's no harm in it.
All I'm trying to say is "factory recommended" is kind've irrelevant to the discussion. The factory recommended GL4 gear oil, but everybody runs GL5. The factory recommended running old-formula straight-weight oil, but it hasn't been available for 30 years so we all make the best decisions we can. There are guys that swear by dino oil. There are guys that swear by synthetic. For me, neither is as important as the additive pack, but that's just my opinion- that and $3 will buy a dark-roast at most Starbucks in America.
Since all now think I am against synthetic oil, I did use synthetic gear oil in the race transmission , only for race use. The oil never gets that hot, in a manual transmission, so wanted the reduced friction. But, because synthetic is like a thinner stuff, I had a few leaks, not so, with the old dino 90wt. oil. A cookie sheet, tied with ty-wraps, under that transmission worked to keep liquids off the track. You heard it first, here. Cookie sheet and that works wonders under leaking VW engines. Not kidding. Buy the big "baker's " sheets, for big leaks. Ever see those "trays", the bread delivery person has, to carry in loafs of bread to the stores ? Make wonderful catch pans, under you car, to catch any oil leaks. They sell them really cheap, once they get banged up or old. Come in both aluminum and fiberglass.
George I would really like to see a picture of that bread tray caching the oil. Ray
Received a 114 page manual on how to assemble the Porsche Speedster I bought, in unfinished condition, like totally unfinished. Been reading the instructions and this is going to really help me assemble it and also to find out what parts are missing , which are needed to complete the project.
Before I work on the body assembly, which is next, as the chassis work, engine and transmission are finished, I have the body suspended by "come along" ratchet devices and cables from the rafters of my garage. Before I get under that hanging body, as the instructions suggest one has to do, I am going to buy some strong tall support stands , so I can live longer. Not trusting my suspended body system. The stands will be for safety , in case those cables break. The instruction manual suggested saw horses about 50 inches X 36 inches and I think they intended for the body to be supported on the saw horses. Some what off topic here, but good safety tips.
I look forward to following along, George.
I went the route of hanging from the rafters, too, but with an electric winch and a frame to get the support chains out to the corners of the cockpit. I put a couple of holes in the rear seat area into the sub-frame, and then caught the holes just in the front corners of the footwells.
A couple of lifts and adjustments to get it balanced and I was good to go, but the body was in the second bay while I rebuilt the rolling pan. Four of us carried it to the "working" bay when I was ready to mate the two - rolled out the pan, brought in the body and got it suspended by the winch, then rolled the pan back in so I could mess with the two and get everything matched just so. Had a couple of small stands for the body, but never really had to support it "up high" for long - it was usually just dry-sitting on the pan when I wasn't around.
You do what you have to do on these things.