Skip to main content

Thinking of building a 1950cc (87x82) engine for my spyder.

Currently the car is set up for highway cruising. Stock 1,2,3 ratios with a 0.84 fourth and 3.88 R&P.

I'm looking for more bottom end torque, but the car does fairly well with it's 1915cc C.B. engine.

My question is, what happens to the torque/rev.situation as you lengthen the con rods. C.B. says the torque curve "moves up".
I assume that's along the rev. line.

The car is currently limited to 6,000-6500rpm. and the new engine would probably see the same use. The current engine can and has delivered 33+ mpg, an i think the 1950cc would not decrease this by a large amount.

I'm aware that balancing will be critical, but Jake Raby's shop is around the corner (35 mi.). I'm sure he would do a first class job, even on a type 1 engine.

Any and all advice welcomed.....Thanks in advance....

Leon C.

Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most.....  

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Thinking of building a 1950cc (87x82) engine for my spyder.

Currently the car is set up for highway cruising. Stock 1,2,3 ratios with a 0.84 fourth and 3.88 R&P.

I'm looking for more bottom end torque, but the car does fairly well with it's 1915cc C.B. engine.

My question is, what happens to the torque/rev.situation as you lengthen the con rods. C.B. says the torque curve "moves up".
I assume that's along the rev. line.

The car is currently limited to 6,000-6500rpm. and the new engine would probably see the same use. The current engine can and has delivered 33+ mpg, an i think the 1950cc would not decrease this by a large amount.

I'm aware that balancing will be critical, but Jake Raby's shop is around the corner (35 mi.). I'm sure he would do a first class job, even on a type 1 engine.

Any and all advice welcomed.....Thanks in advance....

Leon C.

Longer rods will in fact provide more torque at lower RPM's under the correct build. If you move to longer rods you "may" have to move to longer cylinders, or a high deck case, or additional spacers under the cylinders, or special pistons, or some combination of these. I am using 5.7" rods with a high deck case from CB with custom JE pistons. It does develop a bunch of torque through out it's rpm range, how much I don't know as I have not dyno'ed it.

I don't personally like case spacers so I went with the higher deck case. The final deck height at TDC is then determined by the special built pistons.
Post Content
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×