Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by justinh:

In my opinion, if you are going to eliminate the rain guard function by installing a screen, why not just cut out the entire rain guard so you have a better view of the engine?

I thought about just removing the entire deck lid but decided against it. 

 

IM's have much thinner ported area than do the Vintage Speedsters on the deck lid. My goal here is to get more cool, unrestricted air to the engine compartment. The picture above is a very clean looking alternative.

 

 

Originally Posted by Rusty Smith - 2002 IM - Southern, CA.:

What I am trying to find out here is if anyone knows where to purchase this. I have not been able to find one. If I do it will be installed. Then I will let all of you know if it made a difference or not. I will be the test pilot for you!

I wonder if JPS would be able to help? I doubt it's a 'factory option' but it might be worth a call.

 

Ted

Hey Rusty,

I know John used to sell them at JPS. Not cheap. I wanted more airflow but still keep it somewhat water resistant so I modified mine by installing two rows of louvers under the grill - just like the C coupes. I believe there's photos in my file. If you're really interested I have several photos of the process I can send to you.

Originally Posted by craigr:

Does having this grill put in have a real added value/function or would it create a problem greater than it's contribution?

Cosmetic.

I'll be doing one to replace my stock grille. Just having a hard time sourcing the stuff in Hawaii.

I did a custom grille on my 300 SRT with the same.

Also, Kevin can make this up for you, coolrydes.

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • My SRT
Last edited by Bill Prout
Originally Posted by Terry Nuckels--'04 JPS Speedster NorCal:

Hey Rusty,

I know John used to sell them at JPS. Not cheap. I wanted more airflow but still keep it somewhat water resistant so I modified mine by installing two rows of louvers under the grill - just like the C coupes. I believe there's photos in my file. If you're really interested I have several photos of the process I can send to you.

I'd love to see what you've done as well, Terry...

Jeffrey, I installed one of those right under the decklid opening. I wired it to a reverse polarity switch. I experimented with pulling air in, pushing it out, while stationary or moving. End result? No difference. I've run 3" ducting from the front of the car, through a bilge pump and up through the firewall hole in front of the fan; no difference. I fabricated a really neat, basic hood prop to give me 3" of open space at the rear of the deck lid; no difference. The two things that have made a difference to my temps are changing the oil viscosity from 20-50 to 10-40 and running with luggage on my rack. Both of these reduced operating temps by 10 degrees, ambient temps in the 80s.

Originally Posted by Terry Nuckels--'04 JPS Speedster NorCal:

Jeffrey, I installed one of those right under the decklid opening. I wired it to a reverse polarity switch. I experimented with pulling air in, pushing it out, while stationary or moving. End result? No difference. I've run 3" ducting from the front of the car, through a bilge pump and up through the firewall hole in front of the fan; no difference. I fabricated a really neat, basic hood prop to give me 3" of open space at the rear of the deck lid; no difference. The two things that have made a difference to my temps are changing the oil viscosity from 20-50 to 10-40 and running with luggage on my rack. Both of these reduced operating temps by 10 degrees, ambient temps in the 80s.

 

"If man could learn from man there would be giants riding upon the shoulders of other giants."

 

Okay Terry I won't put the screen in. I have already changed my oil to Amsoil Z-Rod 10W-30. Since I refuse to put a luggage rack on my car I will have to focus on the miniature air-conditioning unit that I am having made that runs on an inverter to cool the inside of the engine compartment. Yes people just when you thought there were no more options left...

Originally Posted by Jeffrey Harnasch:

That is just a speaker grill cover a simple google search with the size, shape and finish you want is easy enough to find.
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd...+speaker+grill+cover

 

I am not going to use a speaker grill cover! The old 50's carreras had the screen that's posted in my first post. It is very clean but it does allow water directly onto your alternator.

 

- The spaghetti strainer might look kind of cool in a unique sort of rat rod way.

 

- Ted I have a call in to John at JPS. I'll see if he sells them.

 

- I like the GTWerks unit. I'm trying to visualize how to incorporate it into the deck lid and have it look seamless.

Last edited by Rusty S
Originally Posted by crhemi (Bill):

Terry, do you think that the luggage acted as a scoop?

Yeah, Bill. I do, but Carl has a scientific explanation for it.

I'd  run with the luggage on if it didn't block the rear view (and look stupid on Penny). The gas mileage suffers as well.

I did see some heat relief with the added louvers, so there's that...

great topic, I'm very interested in your findings, Rusty!

Only got to drive the Speedster twice before the weather got cold so I don't have THAT much experience, but the running temps when I DID drive it were cause for concern (for me, anyway) so I'm hoping to have some solutions in place by May.

 

That grille is beautiful, but I'd have to concoct something to slap in place to keep water out in case I get caught in the rain.  Terry's looks like a more practical solution for my region...but [given the direction of airflow over the car while in motion] I'd think that it would be more effective with the louvers spun around, no?  I mean, with the louver-openings toward the front of the car to 'catch' and direct some airflow down?

 

 

We're not the only car guys that struggle with excessive engine heat.  Just Google "lowering underhood temps" or a similar search term.  I think (always a danger, I know) that the engineers of the day knew their stuff, but the engine compartments were designed for stock HP.  With today's engines, including crate engines for the V-8 guys, it's not hard to have an engine with 2-3 times the HP the engine bay was designed for.  Auto engineers say that 1/3 of the available HP goes to actual work, 1/3 to cooling, and 1/3 out the exhaust pipe.  That means lots more heat in the engine bay, and resultant heat soak.  The result is that CFM data for 60 HP is not effective when you have 140 HP or even higher.

 

Front-engine V-8's have tried scoops, louvers, hood stand-offs, etc, just like we try.  Air movement is complicated, with the law of unintended consequences always rearing its head.  On this issue, we are the engineers, like it or not, prepared or not.

Post Content
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×