Mike,
I've yet to drive a tube-framed replica so I can't hazzard a guess as to that advantage/disadvantage. One thing that has permeated this forum is the 'mine is better' syndrome.
All the makers are capable of building you a fine car. It has been my experience through ownership and attending shows and meets of late, that you have to work a little harder, stay vigilant a bit more and be prepared to say," No, that's not good enough!" with some builderzzz, while others are willing to go the extra mile, willingly, and it isn't predicated neccessarily as long as your wallet permits!
My take on the Excellence mag article was this; they like Porsches, they live Porsches. In the old days 356 owners had to deal with snide remarks that our Porsches were nothin' but glorified VWs (right, wrong or indifferent) The Intermeccanica replica is less VW, so the article was 'safe' to put in their magazine.
I've now seen Dale's speedster and uh, names, names, names...Shit, anyway, the dude with the ivory-colored Intermeccanica convertible 'D' and they are both exceptional. Rick Antunnes has an equally exceptional Vintage, but he had to work the phone lines and Kirk's ass-off to get the car the way he wanted. At the kit-car show a few weeks back, two JPS speedsters (also pan-based) were outstanding enough to gleen an award for John Steele, the manufacturererererer.
Does Rick's car belong in Excellence magazine? Do any of John Steele's offerings, sure, they look like Porsches just like an IM, but the aforementioned cars have more of a VW heritage and I think that is a tough sell for some Porsche folks.
My buck seventy-five's worth
MM
(Message Edited 9/17/2003 11:34:34 AM)