Originally Posted by TRP:
Ron / Al,
Your replies beg the question, what would you consider a 'hot' tune for a 1915?
Ted
40x35 heads with enough intake port volume to support 7,000rpm, Engle W125 (or W130) cam with 1.25 rockers, 1 5/8" exhaust, 40 (with the W125) or 44 IDF's with 34mm venturis (36mm in the 44's if you're really looking for the "big number") and 9 1/2:1 (or even 10:1 with the W130) compression. 155? 160? 165? hp, a little soft down low, but at 3500 it would take off and it be a rocket!
Because of the powerband starting at somewhere above 3,000 rpm (and closer to 4,000 with the W130), close ratio 3rd and 4th gears (and a 5th for the highway, otherwise you're stuck at 50 or 55mph) would be needed to really get the most out of it. And any time an engine spends a lot of time above 6,000rpm, springs (even duals, and that's what's needed here) don't last long; you could be replacing them in as little as 10-15,000 miles. The valve guides (depending on how much of the bosses were left in to support them) could be done as well, even if the geometry is spot on. Spark plugs 1 step colder than for a regular aircooled engine will be required, and I always found (with points) they didn't last as long as you'd think they should, so you're replacing plugs more often than normal. I also found points would pit more often, sometimes in as little as 2500 or 3,000 miles, so they were a pia as well.
The W125 (301' adv. duration, 262' @ 0.050") will rev to 6500rpm with 1.1 rockers, and with ported 35x32 heads have almost enough lift (about .460") to get the most out of the port work, but with bigger (40x35) valves and the extra porting there needs to be more lift. 1.25's are the ticket here, but as well as lifting the valve higher (.522" or therabouts minus running clearance and depending on geometry), they also lengthen the dur. @ 0.050" figure by 4 or 5 degrees (the adv. dur. doesn't change, as these are the start and stop points for lift and are not affected by rocker ratio), and this extends the top end 300rpm (or so, depending on the port work, venturi and exhaust tube size).
The W130 revs a little higher (400? 500?rpm) and also starts a little later, so in a street car I would really consider this cam a better candidate for a stroker engine, where the torque from more displacement (and lower rod ratio) will smooth the transition to the powerband somewhat.
Both these camshafts (and anything with similar dur. @ .050" figures) produce somewhat peaky, "high strung" (especially with only stock stroke) engines and not the jump into any time and drive for a weekend or across the country powerplants that most of us (I think) are looking for. Any cam/rocker combo that revs much above 6,000rpm is not in it's most efficient phase at the rpm's (3,000-3500) we tend to sit at on the highway (it may even get what seems like decent mileage bit it won't be optimum). Along with the higher maintenance of a higher revver, this is why I (and others) are continually suggesting building over 2 liter engines; properly done, the same heads, carbs and exhaust (with a milder cam) will make the same top hp figure but with much more power "under the curve" or throughout the rpm range.
I've posted this before, but it shows the difference in an engine's cylinder filling capabilities (and therefore the power it makes) when using 1.1 vs 1.25 rockers, and it's with a W125 cam. The differences with any cam and the 2 rocker combos will be similar-