Difficult? No. Likely to happen? Also No.
If somebody is doing just fine for themselves running their business just as they are-- why in the world would they take on a customer with a list of demands that would require redoing the entire system they have in place. Perhaps you missed the part where Todd said there were 10 cars being completed along with his.
We think we're the center of the replica speedster universe here, but we represent a fraction of the actual owners out there, and an even smaller fraction of the prospective buyers. We can't even get site regulars to believe the stuff they read on this site regarding "issues" and the inability to get some builders to change how they do (or do not do) things for out-of-state buyers. The capacity for insanity (if insanity is defined by doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result) is nearly infinite.
We are expecting this site to provide some impetus, to push builders into building better cars. We don't have that kind of horsepower-- we never have, and never will. I sold my second car when I came to the cold, hard realization that JPS had built the best car he was going to without me standing over his shoulder. The things he could do well, he did well. The things he couldn't do were never going to get done by him. My choice was to build a car myself, or have it built by somebody I knew would be as particular as I was. Thank the Lord for Henry Reisner.
We collectively welcome new owners to the madness. The answer here is to "stop the madness".
We need to stop acting like "it's all good" just because some guys get decent cars from problem builders. "75% of the time it works every time" is not the same thing as somebody providing consistent build quality. It's madness.
Yeah, Kias have decent build quality for $17K. Kia's new plant in West Point has the capacity to build 360,000 cars a year. For the US market. That represents a fraction of their worldwide production capacity. There's an economy of scale that makes comparing what a Kia costs to what a replica Speedster costs a matter of apples and oranges. We need to stop that. Hand-made custom things cost what they cost. If somebody could build a decent replica for less (and sell it at a profit) I'm sure they would. SAS builds a replica for $30K, and has gone bankrupt twice (three times?) in recent memory. Expecting top-notch cars for below market prices is madness.
"Sorting" is to be expected. Brakes that don't work, paint that is lousy, and steering that is unsafe does not constitute "sorting". Jack Crosby's car had the pan cut incorrectly-- it took Jake Raby a TON of time to try to straighten the driveline out. This is not "sorting"-- this is horrible build quality. I had a car with a $5000 hardtop with a glue-in headliner with raw edges and a header that didn't pull within 1/4" of the windshield frame in spots. I fixed it for another $2000. This wasn't "sorting", this was just criminal neglect. It's madness.
When a prospective new buyer like Annalise or Todd posts excitedly about their new car, and how great it's going to be, and how it's all good-- we need to stop drinking the collective Kool-Aid, jumping on the happy-time bandwagon, and then acting shocked (SHOCKED!, I tell you) when the inevitable happens. It happens a lot. It's happened a lot for 10 years, at least. This is madness.
A buyer does not always get what he pays for, but he always pays for what he gets.