Actually, you guys realize this is turning out to be a disaster for "newer" cars as well?
Brand new cars that are flex-fuel allegedly have no problems with ethanol. But it turns out that cars just 2 or 3 years old that were also thought to be able to accept ethanol are occasionally failing.
Five to ten year old cars running on gasoline 90%/ethanol 10%, which was supposed to be a very safe level, regularly suffer fuel system failures from hoses, injection bits, and oh yeah, let's not forget gasoline tanks. Alot of vehicles use plastic gasoline tanks. Some tanks are attacked by the mix.
What the hell? Fuel that eats your tank? It's almost as if the idea was to guarantee a certain number of automotive casualties across all value levels to either keep repair business in operations, or vehicle replacement (dealerships/makers) in business.
Sound like silly paranoia even as I write it. But as there are no advantages (worse fuel economy, less power, definately chance of damage) except to the corn industry - can't really think of why else this has been allowed. Not just allowed, encouraged, even dictated.
Screw 'em. I'll replace what I need to replace and ride my bicycle if all else fails.
angela