Originally Posted by TerryLipford:
What is it with you people ? Rant ? Nope, read my posting and you will see that I feel very strongly that almost (make that ALMOST) everything Kirk did was great. There was no rant there, it was a description of what he promised to do and then did not.
Your remarks are insulting, read the post, understand what was said, and if you cannot realize what the point was, then don't sit down to your keyboard until you can calmly understand what was said.
I had nothing to do with a post 4 years ago, and I quite frankly am not interested in hearing anymore of what you have to say either.
It is you, not me, who "cannot realize what the point was". I'm trying to help you here, albeit sarcastically.
Fine, not a rant. You win. Is comment an acceptable replacement? Good. Now go back to my last post and replace the word rant with the word comment. Get it now? Still don't? Maybe this is your first online forum. Allow me to explain.
You are on an online forum. There are millions of them, all operating under largely the same basic guidelines. They are comprised of content posted by users. You are a user, as am I, as is everyone else who posts on the forum. The information on a forum is broken up into different topics. In order for the forum to function smoothly, as well as for everyone to GET THE MOST HELPFUL INFORMATION POSSIBLE, the comments posted by users in each topic should relate directly to the topic or to wherever the conversation has drifted in that topic. Yours did not.
"I had nothing to do with a post 4 years ago". Look at the comment left before yours. It was posted in October of the year 2008. That was almost four years ago. No one had posted anything on this topic in almost four years. It is a dead topic, left viewable for archive purposes.
Posting on a topic this old is a faux pas on an online forum. It can be very confusing for a plethora of reasons, mainly because people often don't realize the posts are old.
A hypothetical example: If someone posted five minutes ago on a topic about "The Best Brakes for Speedsters", people may click on it, go back a few posts, and read that Brand X makes the best brakes without realizing that the comments about Brand X were made in 2008. Those Brand X brakes may be archaic by now and much better brakes could be available. Or maybe they are no longer available and it would be a wild goose chase trying to track down a set. Or maybe in 2011 they were found to be defective and unsafe. This information wasn't posted in this four year old topic but because someone brought it back from the dead five minutes ago (which is what you did here), they may not realize the rest of the info in this topic is four years old and thus outdated. This is confusing, inefficient, and does not make for rewarding internetting.
Side note: Topics with no activity for, I believe it was, one year used to be read-only before the website switch. This should be implicated again to avoid confusion.
Not only is reviving a dead topic a no-no, so is posting way off topic out of left field. This is always true, but especially so when the nature of your post is negative. Go back and read the posts in this topic. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM WITHOUT EXCEPTION IS A VINTAGE OWNER EXPRESSING THEIR SATISFACTION WITH KIRK, MARY, AND VINTAGE SPEEDSTERS. Even if this was a current topic and those posts were all made in the last 48 hours, posting what you did, the way you did is somewhere in between rude and miscategorized.
We can all see that you just joined the forum a few months ago. Coming out of the gate complaining about one of the unanimous good guys in this industry probably won't earn you many friends around here. Had your post been more of a "Hi guys, I see everyone really seems to support Vintage Speedsters and has high praise for their customer service. However, I'm having a bit of a problem with them because _________. Can anyone here help?" you may have received more helpful insight.
But the number one thing preventing people from helping you is that NOBODY REALIZES YOU NEED HELP WHEN YOU POST IN A TOPIC TITLED THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOUR POST IS ABOUT. A post titled "More Kudos to Vintage Speedsters" does not imply that someone is having an issue with Vintage Speedsters. Which brings me to...
What I was originally hinting at is that you should have started a new topic. It should have been titled something along the lines of "Help - I'm having trouble with Vintage Speedsters". That way it would have a title that actually tells people what it's about. More people could have seen that there was an issue that needed solving. In fact, I suggest doing that now.
I can tell you firsthand, the people on this forum are a treasure trove of information and they are all too happy to share that info with you. I once broke down in Las Vegas, four and a half hours from Los Angeles. Well, four and a half hours back when I had a 1600cc motor. Once I get the car back from John Steele with the Subaru 2.5 in it, it'll be more like 3 hours haha. Anyway, I was stranded in Vegas and didn't know an honest mechanic let alone one that works on Speedsters. Within an hour of posting on this website, I had the address and phone number of a shop in Vegas that is both reputable and familiar with replica Speedsters as well as the name of a contact there. Absolutely priceless.
The title of my post was something like "Broken down in Vegas - Please help". Had I posted the same issue under a three year old topic titled "I drove to and from Vegas with no problems at all", I doubt I would have gotten much help.
Hopefully this makes a little more sense than my initial sarcastic post.