We interrupt this thread for an editorial pontification. The rant expressed below, is probably not the opinion of the staff or mangement of this forum, but of the hick-town poster. Proceed with caution...
I don't want to hijack this thread, and I'm not as rabid about this as I'll probably come off, but here goes...
There have been several recent posts on roll-bars, seat belts, and all manner of safty related equipment. Here's the thing about modern seat belts and such in these cars- the number one thing that says "replica" to me is the e-brake between the seats (mine has one, most of us do), number two is going to be the 8 slot chrome VW wheels. But coming in a close third is the three-point or otherwise non "period" looking seat-belts.
Seat belts are great, as are air bags, safety helmets, and Nomex (I hear)- but if I ever got in a wreck bad enough to need a seat belt in my speedster, I think that the number of points it was mounted on would probably be the least of my concerns. I worry sometimes that in our effort to create the safest possible replicas that we often overlook the obvious. Have you ever seen how the windshield mounts to the body? Have you ever looked inside your doors? Have you ever been buzzing down the interstate and looked at a semi axle at eye level? Sure you have... we all have.
I want to be as safe as possible within reason. But don't lose sight of the fact that these are fiberglass bodies without any crumple zones. It's not a motorcycle, but safety-wise- it's closer to a bike than to a 350Z. If you want three point belts- go for it. I'm sticking with something a little more "retro" looking, since I'm only deluding myself anyhow.
OK, "deluding" was a stronger word than I wanted, but my point stands- the belts are not nearly as important as keeping my guard up. Reason number 534 why these cars are not so good as daily drivers... IMHO.
And back to our regularly scheduled programming...