A 1776 can be as tame as stock (stock cam, stock carb, stock heads) with just a few more hp and a wee bit more torque, a peppy little thing that makes 50% more power than a 1600 and revs to 5500-6,000 rpm and still has reasonable bottom end/lower midrange with dual kadrons or Webers/Dellortos, Engle W110 camshaft and ported stock valve heads, or a 140hp small block eater that revs to 7,000 rpm with said Webers/Dellortos, W125 (or even W130 if you really want it to be a 'bullet') cam and ported 40x35 heads. Adjust expectations for engine life length and amount of maintenance needed.
So you think it is bad if it has a Porsche title ?
It is if the state you are in taxes it like it's a real Porsche. I'm not sure, but there also may be difficulties in registering it in some other states? And btw, I fixed your grammar- taking the time to proofread what you've written before posting makes it easier to understand.
@Stan Galat wrote- "I was thinking the same thing, Bob. Thereβs nothing wrong with a nicely built 1776. But at this point in the game, an 82 mm crank to make it a 2110 seems like pennies to vastly improve the experience."
That only works if the heads, carbs and exhaust are all more than needed for the smaller displacement/rpm range. IF any of those components are sized too small for the larger displacement, you'll end up with fantastic power to the limit of that part, but it won't even rev to what the redline is now. For example, if the engine goes with power to 5500 or 6,000 rpm as a 1776, adding that much displacement would lower top revs close to 1,000 rpm if 1 or more parts is wrong.