Skip to main content

Originally Posted (in another thread) by ALB:

Yeah, but there's a difference between working it into a fun, driveable and dependable car and trying to turn it into something it was never meant to be...

So, in another thread, Al made this statement. It got me thinking about my own 15 year trajectory in this hobby, and about changing expectations. Some guys know themselves pretty well, and build or buy pretty much exactly what they want without a lot of muss/fuss. Jim Ignacio leaps to mind.

 

Most of us, though, have expectations that evolve over the years until what we are ultimately looking for bears very little resemblance to what we were after a few years before. When I bought my first car, I was after exactly what I got: a cheap, bare-bones "15 minute vacation" car for bombing around in after work.

 

I loved it enough that I wanted something to enjoy for more of the year, and I set out on a quest to have a "weather-tight", hardtop equipped JPS built. John made a lot of promises, and delivered... a speedster with an incredibly leaky hard-top. I sold the JPS and had an IM "coach" built.

 

The IM is an order of magnitude better than my two previous speedsters, but it remains a speedster- it will drip when driving in a huge rain. It's totally manageable, but a 9-month-a-year speedster ceased to be what I was after.

 

For a period of time, I was in love with the capabilities for mayhem of a big Type 1. I fell in love with the "Mighty-Mouse" ethos, and built my car into something a flat-lander could understand: a highly strung, highly built monster. It was fast, and that's a fact. The motto at the time was, "The car says, 'Speedster' on the side. I'd really like to tell the truth". I did the dry-sump a few years later to keep oil inside the engine when I was being stupid.

 

That was fun and cool and all, but I got wrecked when I decided on a lark (at the last minute, really) to drive the car out to a get-together with some friends in Sacramento/Chico/Tahoe, CA in 2012. I had the time of my life- the "mac-daddy" engine did not fare as well singing along at 4k RPM for days and days straight.

 

When I got back home, I set about trying to rectify that. My 2332 became a 2276. The Chinese nicasil jugs went out and some plain-'ol-Mahles went in. My 48 Tri-Jets were swapped for 45s, etc. It was much better, but I went a bridge too far in the other direction. Lord Acton said, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely", or something like that. It's true.

 

So... the engine came out, and the science project continued. Twin-plug heads and a different cam (hopefully, "not too hot, not too cold-- juuuust riiiiight") this go-around. The engine is back in the car, but my lovely bride brings up some good points. She thinks that (perhaps) I ought to just enjoy it for what it is, and lay off the endless Frankenstein stuff. As usual, she's right. This will be the 5th combination back there. She understands my need to do this stuff, but she'd like me to spend a bit more time driving and a bit less time building stuff I'm just going to tear out next year. "Perfection" is a mirage, always juuuust out of reach. It's the very definition of quixotic.

 

If I were less committed to this creaky old platform, I'd probably do it differently. A big Type 4 has the advantage of displacement for "easy power" and a design that encourages longevity. It can be built to be both powerful and able to cover several time-zones without muss and fuss. Of course a Subaru can as well, but I'm a Luddite, and Luddites are constitutionally unable to do stuff like that. It's in the handbook. I'll probably eventually end up being sucked kicking and screaming into EFI and crank-fired ignition, but staying air-cooled is where I personally draw my ridiculous line. Your mileage may vary.

 

But back to Al's point: for borderline OCD Type-AA personalities, it's a hard thing to hear that you can't have everything you want. We're used to getting it, or more likely making it happen ourselves. A Speedster (more than a "D" or a Cabriolet) forces compromise. Some things can be squeezed out (with great difficulty and expense), but a lot of it is just baked in the cake. Perversely, that's the part I like. I can rage-against-the-machine and howl-at-the-moon till the cows come home. I can treat a long trip like it's a NASA trip to the moon. But I'll still likely end up under some random overpass in Nebraska, trying to piece together a what-not with a 1/4-20 screw, a shoe-lace, and a beer can I found in the ditch.

 

If it were not so, I would not love it so much.

 

I didn't marry my wife 30 years ago because she was easy to live with (I really had no idea, and frankly wouldn't have cared). I married her because she was beautiful and fun and exciting. It took a while to understand the stuff that could not change for any amount of effort- and even longer to be OK with those things. A lot of the rough edges and sharp points needs smoothed off, but some stuff will always be there. Those weird quirks are a huge part of the fun now, and a reminder that there's stuff I can change and stuff that I can't. She lives with my idiosyncrasies, and I live with her's. She clearly got the short end of the stick (as everybody in my hometown reminds me), but it takes just a little bit of work for both of us. We're both just passengers on this rock- it was spinning before I got here, and will be spinning after I leave. A beautiful, imperfect car that turns me on (like the beautiful, sexy, imperfect woman I've lived with all these years) requires a few concessions. Both are good reminders that most truly great things require a bit of flexibility. 

 

I understand what it is. I love that stupid thing.

"BlazeCut®(TM) woulda' saved it!!"

Last edited by Stan Galat
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Terry Nuckels--'04 JPS Speedster NorCal:

So...does this mean the twin plug is out?

No. Twin plug is in. All the cool kids are doing it.

 

Originally Posted by Marty Grzynkowicz-2012 IM Suby-Roadster:
So, what you're saying is that you're out of ideas for the moment; that won't last long, LOL!

Well put, I am hoping my new turbo and front end conversion is it for a while:-)

Fat chance. There's always something you can do.

Last edited by Stan Galat
Originally Posted by TRP:
Well... Damn. I wonder when I should tell the kids they aren't going to college because Daddy spent all the money on car parts?

It just means they'll be going to community college instead of some big name, money-sucking post secondary institution, and they'll may even end up being better human beings for the experience. But that's years away, and now that you've experienced your basic first stage VW aircooled performance upgrade, let's talk about that 2165 or 2276; at the very minimum it will need some kick-ass 40x35 (or 42x37) heads...

 

Stan, you are so in the first group; your willingness to explore the possibilities and take the platform to it's highest levels is refreshing. You're laying the blueprint for other people to follow. I love what you're doing with your car!!!

 

And Tom, that's the joy of these things; your vision is what's important, and you can take it as far as you want. I can hardly wait to see what you do this winter. 

 

 

But I'll still likely end up under some random overpass in Nebraska, trying to piece together a what-not with a 1/4-20 screw, a shoe-lace, and a beer can I found in the ditch.

 

Been there.......parked at the side of the road, hood up, trying to jury-rig a new rad hose for my V8 Miata.....FOUR TIMES in one year!

.......me, walking down a deserted highway, empty plastic gallon jugs in my hands, looking for water.

 

My IM is the last vehicle I will heavily modify.  Any new or used cars I buy in the future will be kept stock, or near stock (shocks, springs etc).

As for my IM, the last little problem has been fixed (a section of the top of the fan shroud had to be taken out to clear the engine hood and then the shroud had to be repainted).  As soon as the paint dries the engine/tranny is going back in.

 

Another pain-in-the-butt problem that had to be solved was that the fuel injection ECU and the crank fired ignition ECU wouldn't talk to each other.  They were both hooked up to the same throttle body sensor and every time we tried to bench run the system the crank fired ECU shut down.

The solution was to drill a hole in the other throttle body and install a separate senor for the crank fired ECU.

Fingers crossed that everything will work as it should when we fire up the engine.

Last edited by Ron O

Yup I see craving for higher HP infects the Speedster crowd...LOL

 

I for one am glad I 'grew' out of that...who the heck am I trying to impress, some god ol'boys???

 

Oh, do not get me wrong there is nothing wrong with with pumping 500-600hp(V-8's) out of an engine...yet when you put the pedal to the metal with that kind of HP things tend to break...been there, done that payed the price

 

My philosophy today is " if it runs well, does everything you want it to, maybe not as fast or as well...do not tempt Murphy" 'cuz it can go to h*** in a hand bag faster than your bank account can cover it...

 

 

Post Content
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×