Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'm thinking about running a heater hose inside the steel box tubing. I may have to open it up at one end on the structure or both. Its not a big deal I have a plasma cutter and I can weld. I considered the heat running down the tunnel, but I would have to close off the heater openings on the outer frame rails. Then install the slides on the tunnel, it would look much different than the original design. But who am I kidding this is a replica it's as fake as boob's 

I asked Carey to route the heat directly to the rear bulkheads next to the seats thereby eliminating the loss to the front.  This means no defrost, but I thought that it would be the most effective.  I won't pick up my car until next Wednesday, but I received this email from Carey today "your heat will now melt the hair off your arms... well, OK, maybe not that hot, but in 5 miles or so it was damn nice."

I was just out the the home improvement store, and have some ideas. Looking at the CMC manual I think I can snake a small flexible hose inside the boxed frame. I shop vac, or sump pump hose may be just the ticket. I can seal it of on the O.D. with pipe insulation near the engine and build a duct work flange of sorts out of sheet metal near the slide vent. The hose being less than 2.5 inches will keep the air speed up and should work much better than the steel frame to move the air through. The 911 Porsche uses a similar system (that was the basis of my thinking)

Originally Posted by Michael McKelvey in Ann Arbor:

I have a CMC with the heat running through the frame side tubes.

 

I have wondered about insulating them.

Anything you can do to insulate them will help. They lose a significant amount of heat because they aren't insulated. (The constricted airflow through the frame doesn't help either.) The R-value of steel is essentially 0 and the R-value of the surface air films inside and outside the frame won't be much more than that because of the moving air. Basically, it's about as bad a heat duct design as you can get. For comparison, even 1/4" thick cardboard has an R-value of 1.

 

 

Adding a secondary duct inside the frame could help as you would gain the insulating benefit of some dead air between duct and frame in addition to whatever the duct itself provides.

 

 

Dynamat is too thin for good thermal insulation. Dynaliner maybe, but I'm not sure how well it would hold up under the car. Spray-on thermal barrier might do ok.

Last edited by justinh
Post Content
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×