Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

And these are from my friend Reggie, who had to have the engine in his car replaced after he blew it up on the race track. Large fireball, lots of smoke and no apparent damage to the paint -- which, on this car, would have cost a tub of money to re-shoot. He now has a progressive nitrous system and a three-point-something-liter engine, making about 500 horses at the tires.
This car is ridiculous:

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 073010 Reggie I
  • 073010 Reggie II
Marty - the rear end of that Pandomania, or Pananemic, or Panwhatever, immediately reminded me of the 70s Jensen.

Stan - Ya gotta define "economical car". Corvettes get near 30 MPG on the freeway. So do smaller Mercedes. Even 3/4 ton pickups are advertising up to 30 for the highway (if you believe that, I got a bridge for sale). If you want economy - ya gotta pay for it!
I'm with Ron on the "I know I'll never be able to afford one", Cory so no, not really ;-)

I do like them though, I've seen a few of them, actually sat in one awhile back. I like it for what it is, a "performance sedan"; everyone else is making one, why not Porsche? It has a unique look to it that I see has a "love it / hate it" characteristic about it. As much as I hate that Porsche has entered the SUV and sedan market, I like what they've done here, the Cayenne, eh, not so much.
Well, I have yet to see/notice one, but very well may have had its image on my retina. Which is to say that it gets confused not w/ the Bentleys, Maybachs, Ferraris etc. (we really do not have any of these around here in the sticks) but w/ the Accords, Camrys and Lexuses. I'm sure they are very nice, but they do not play alone or even stand alone, but rather are like so many others, it's like: Who cares??
Post Content
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×