Just thinking about camber compensators (I had one on a 62 Corvair):
The reason a Corvair needed one was because it had 13 inch wheels, soft springs, and a large amount of body roll in the corners. Now add skinney, fairly hard compound, corded tires used back then, and "loosing the rear end" was an event waiting to happen. When the rear end did break away under sprited motoring, it was usually a curb or a rut in the road that suddenly caught the rear wheel causing it to "tuck under" and maybe flip the car.
Now think of a speedster, with larger diameter radial tires, much better road adhesion, less weight and a lower center of gravity. The likelihood of the rear tires "tucking under" would seem to be much less. Plus, if you had an anti-sway bar on the front, you are also reducing body roll in the corners. For these reasons, I believe a modern speedster with a swing axle is far less likely to "tuck under" than an original Corvair.
Now, forget what I said, go buy that camber compensator and drive it like you stole it!