Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Steve,

Here's my opinion, for a classic body only (for what little it's worth). Whatever sets your car apart from the typical replica seems to make it a bit more desirable on the resale market, as long as it was original to some model year 356. If you go with beehive tail lights it marks the car as a pre-57, and it is cool if other details match that year. Not a lot of replicas have them.

Of course, if you don't care about driving up your resale, and you only want to build a car that's cool to you, then get whatever you want. It IS a replica, so you're not butchering a classic.
Thanks Bruce, would you like to be my fan club? I'm waiting for my record deal to happen, afterall I am in Nashville, I think its supposed to work that way - everybody gets a record deal at some point.

Hey John Hallstrand, how did they do that attached windshield on your cabriolet, is it fabricated with fiberglass reinforced with metal rod frame inside or what?
As far as Quality the beehives win Stoodard offer some nice ones of brass construction that are as well made as you could ask for.

All the teardrop ,I have seen dont even come close to keeping the bulbs in the sockets. Thats a real problem!!

Beehives up to 1956.

Teardrops from 1957, to end of production

I wish the beehive suppliers to Stoodards would make a teardrop kit with the same sockets then the would be up to snuff.

I wanted Teardrops bad enough to change out the sockets with salvage parts to improve them.
Greg, something like that; it's pretty darn rigid. Eddie, That's kind of where I am with teardrops. I remember way back when I first started studying these cars that the teardrop lights had a more appealing look for me, subjectively speaking. The beehive look grabbed my attention mostly because they looked unique. Greg, do you need any side men? I can back you up on my dulcimer if you will sing in the key of D.
Yeah I agree with ya Bruce. That light assembly is for a PT Cruiser. I have also seen the 59 Caddy style in this configuration. I do like the shape of the stock PT tail lights. I going to borrow one of the neighbors Pt taillight lenses to see what it looks like. The light contiur just may work. I'll post a picture for commens and roasting.
Joe
The beehives remind me of Lucas left-overs, and yet there are some beehive applications that say, "Look at me, ain't I cool" unfortuneately I don't think the ass end of speedster is one of those places. I like 'em on the coupes though...
The teardrop seems to have been designed to fit the flow of the body line after Ferry and the boys could afford a little design work maybe with increased sales dollars!

I read where the transition from beehive to teardrop did take place mid '57.

Contrary to the above thought, I saw some of Gary Emory's flock at the Thunderhill event that had 911 or 912s with small flat button brakelights in the rear lamp recess instead of the stock wrap-around units and they lookd pretty clean.
From deep inside the Benicia 'who cares department'
MM
Ok, my tailights are made from a '67 Sunbeam Tiger. I told John Steele I wanted recessed tailights, and the only style that seemed to look about right were Sunbeam Tigers. John calmly said, "no problem" and walked across the shop to retreive a pair of those exact lights. I about fell off the chair, but today those are my lights. At least on the inside, the red lens is custom made to fit the fiberglass cut out.
Fun to be different. I don't need authenticity. Half the people I talk to think this is a "Car Mine Gee Yaa" anyway.
In George's defense he is of course referring to the factory making the switch to save money and not implying that beehives are better than teardrops. Its just a historical fact as he recalls it...

And George I haven't mentioned it but the car you spec'd out is very, very nice. You should be proud to own and drive it and Henry should be proud of creating it.

Brian

Thanks, Brian; it was easy to formulate the idea and of course an expensive project (you can't take it with you...) but the results are definitely the creation of Henry at IM.

Many features of my car were first time items/requests and Henry went above and beyond the call of duty engineering, testing, and perfecting their integration into the final result. Other items (Bivens alloy wheels, PreLuber, restored vintage Becker Grand Prix radio, 1950's Bosch fog lights, etc.) were simply a matter of patient research and reaching for the checkbook. Carquip (in Colorado) helped spec and then built the close ratio 901 5-speed with torque biased LSD.

Pat Downs at CB Performance was very patient and enthusiastic with my engine build, and the result is up to his usual high standards. CB also turned me on to their new wide-five four wheel disk brake setup which was then in the testing stages and became available for use on my car.

Some of the people on this forum snipe at me for spending the money (and it ain't over yet - 2,500cc four cylinder Porsche 911 engine in the works), but at least I'm getting what I want in a true, all-purpose sports car with vintage eye appeal.

Post Content
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×