Here is the middle of the story...
Turbo vs non-turbo: I did not have a chance to drive a turbo but I can say that given the massive complexity of the turbo and the great performance of the non turbo 2.2L, I would order my car with a normally aspirated 2.5L and a 5 speed standard transmission. Because I can easily get 250HP out of this engine before going to a turbo, I would definitely ask Steve to install HD rear CVs and axles he reserves for the turbo. Also because I may want to convert to a turbo or a future buyer may want to do the same, I would ask Steve to provide a turbo capable frame and Intercooler mounts.
Standard vs Automatic Transmission: I test drove both a standard and an automatic version of the 2.2L Cabriolet. Hands down, go with the standard if you want sports car performance. Steve recommends an automatic with the 2.5L turbo but admits it is personal preference.
Handling, etc.: High speed lane changes were solid with no roll or sway. Cornering and braking on a section of winding mountial road were similarly solid. Breaking felt old fashioned after having power assist ABS for so many years in my big old Volvo S80. However, braking distances were short and braking was precise. I felt no difference between the 17" wide stance and the standard 15" narrow tires in the level of driving I was doing. Flared fenders and big wheels are a personal choice much more than a performance choice for a vehicle of this weight. I think the flares and the wide stance look tough and would probably go with them. Perhaps an assymetric setup with fat rubber in the back and skinnies in front with no flare? Steering was very easy and never gave a hint of understeer or any instabilities.
Tomm in Olympia
Original Post